VERY WORK IN PROGRESS

1st LIST OF CONTENTS: MAIN TOPICS; MAIN PHASES OF THOUGHT:

1.Piece Lists: concepts to acknowledge every piece on the board

2.Movement Stars: concepts to acknowledge every piece’s every direction of movement

3.Effects per any 1 Move: concepts to acknowledge every detail in every move

4.Ideals: concepts to craft both’s plans most easily

5.Attacks to Defences: concepts to find, with Lists & Stars & Effects & Ideal comparisons, all relevant candidate_moves; from both’s compared Ideal Plans, to the Actual plans of both; the Syntheses

6.Choice Tree navigation: concepts to prioritize and deprioritize, then select, THE Actual Plan (the main branch)

Continue reading →

Anesthesia for meat animals before physical violence to make them meat. From what I know, they are at best struck into their foreheads by a blunt metal rod, then throats slit. Sometimes the rod fails to nonconsciousate them, and the rod probably hurts much anyway, if only for a short duration.

Continue reading →

Make a political vote % test, testing about the future sequences, from various changes, to our global and universal world, and its population as counted in humans foremost. *1

Continue reading →

My proposition for advancing the English language toward more advanced gender neutrality, a part of egalitarianism (equalityism – – > equalism):

Continue reading →

Add every topic in the Bible into a 2nd contents list, more detailed than the 1st traditional list of bookpart names, which seem less descriptive to most.

Edit: I was recently given the New World translation (Study edition) by a Jehova’s Witness. It contains this updated contents list!

Advantages from a 2nd contents list: Faster grasp the whole “story” continuum. Select topics easier. Learn faster. Get less confused about whatever the book is about. And whatever other Advantages.

Disadvantages: more paper and more ink required. Somebodies need to do the topic work and printing and publishing. Many people need to Wonder how this wasn’t outvented centuries ago.

Example, translated from a Finnish Lutheran official Bible:

Continue reading →

I think I’ve managed to find a system of controls for mouse&keyboard, which covers most of the essentials of real-life sword fights. This system hasn’t been tried in any game I know of. Closest match is probably Mount&Blade (M&B). This is about as simple to use for newbies as the M&B system (maybe even simpler!), yet more varied and deep to master for veterans.

Continue reading →

LOOGIS-FILOSOFINEN TUTKIELMA Continue reading →

Oikeussalissa istuvat tuomari(t), syyttäjä, syyttävän puolen asianajaja, puolustavan puolen asianajaja.

Syyttäviä puolia on siis 2, puolustavia 1.

Kaikki puolet saavat suunnilleen saman määrän puheaikaa. Käy siis niin, että syyttävät puolet (2) ovat enemmän aikaa äänessä kuin puolustava puoli (1).

Continue reading →